©2008 ~grace-note
Details
Submitted: May 2
File Size: 277 KB
Image Size: 29.7 KB
Resolution: 600×377
Comments: 50
Favourites & Collections: 61 [who?]
Views
Total: 383
Today: 0
Downloads
Total: 0
Today: 0
Embed
Thumb
Picture
Make: Canon
Model: Canon EOS 5D
Shutter Speed: 1/2000 second
F Number: F/2.2
Focal Length: 135 mm
ISO Speed: 100
Date Picture Taken: Apr 20, 2008, 4:34:35 PM
Submitted: May 2
File Size: 277 KB
Image Size: 29.7 KB
Resolution: 600×377
Comments: 50
Favourites & Collections: 61 [who?]
Views
Total: 383
Today: 0
Downloads
Total: 0
Today: 0
Embed
Thumb
Picture
Make: Canon
Model: Canon EOS 5D
Shutter Speed: 1/2000 second
F Number: F/2.2
Focal Length: 135 mm
ISO Speed: 100
Date Picture Taken: Apr 20, 2008, 4:34:35 PM
Artist's Comments
...good value:
one dress for two occasions.
--
not sure about the watermark? Should I do it like this for the rest of the portraits i'm thinking of doing or just the good ol' dA water mark? ie. removable with a click = lazy.
one dress for two occasions.
--
not sure about the watermark? Should I do it like this for the rest of the portraits i'm thinking of doing or just the good ol' dA water mark? ie. removable with a click = lazy.
Report a Policy Violation
Random Deviation
| Random Deviant
| Our Partners
© 2008 deviantART Inc. | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy | Services | Help & FAQ
© 2008 deviantART Inc. | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy | Services | Help & FAQ
Devious Comments
The photo is brilliant. So crisp and full of life.
As for the watermark of the title, I like it. I always change my titles years later for some reason, so I never use title watermarks. I think it would be very professional to put your real name in a watermark like the title one.
--
Wake up each day as if it were on purpose.
Yeah...I have hundreds of file and folders everywhere, so I might not always be able to find the layer file! -dies- so maybe the dA watermark>? problem with that is that it is...huge. and obvious. -.-
--
Andd are you serious "grace-note photography" is on this photo? My computer is not showing it at all. Not in thumb nor in full view... :stumped:
--
Wake up each day as if it were on purpose.
and on stealage, i dont' think that would be a problem for me.
--
--
Pretty crappy.
And I love this photo, I could see someone adding a quote in black sketchy type font and putting it on their myspace!
--
Wake up each day as if it were on purpose.
XD lawlz!
--
The best photographers have such fine focus work that even with a watermark, the viewer can see the gorgeous details!
--
Wake up each day as if it were on purpose.
I do see your watermark (comment related to an earlier one lol).
I personally believe you should keep using your own watermark, and not rely on dA for this..
I mean, it sure is a nice feature, but as you said it looks rather huge and ugly, and most of the time it covers part you don't want to be covered..
Besides, you never know what new update dA will make for the coming versions of the website, and watermarks could stay as much as they could be removed in the future..
Adding your own watermark is a few minutes more of work, but it is your own way of protecting your work. Besides, I like how you do them usually, it's almost as if they blend in perfectly
Anyways, keep up the great work. I'm rarely commenting, but I'm always watching
I'll try to catch you in ThumbsShare someday
--
Someone kick me out of my mind
I hate these thoughts I can't deny...
Previous Page12345... Next Page